Do mindfulness practitioners handle mental distractions differently?
Research suggests that mindfulness practice may contribute to a more flexible relationship with spontaneous thoughts, an aspect that could be relevant for understanding persistent mental patterns associated with anxiety, excessive worry, or rumination.
Published Oct 6, 2026
It is a common experience: we are focused on a task and, suddenly, we realise that our mind has drifted elsewhere, revisiting memories, planning, or simply wandering. This natural tendency, known as mind-wandering, occupies a large portion of our waking lives. But does mindfulness practice change the way we recognise these distractions and return to the present moment?
To answer this question, researchers from the University of Udine, Italy, studied 56 adults, half of whom were experienced mindfulness meditation practitioners and half with no regular meditation experience. During breath-focused meditation sessions, participants kept their attention on their breathing with their eyes closed. In one task, they were asked to press a button whenever they became aware that their mind had drifted to thoughts, memories, or mental images. In another task, they were interrupted eight times by a random auditory signal and asked to indicate whether, at that exact moment, they were focused on their breathing or whether their mind had wandered. Throughout both tasks, the researchers continuously recorded heart rate and eye movements.
The results revealed clear differences between the two groups. In participants with no meditation experience, heart rate increased once attention had been re-established on the breath following a distraction episode. In contrast, experienced meditators maintained a stable heart rate throughout the entire process, suggesting a smoother and less effortful transition between distraction and concentration.
Eye movements also revealed interesting patterns. In both groups, they increased primarily when participants became aware of a distraction and redirected their attention back to the breath. However, meditators consistently showed fewer eye movements than controls. In addition, they reported fewer distraction episodes detected spontaneously through this self-report method and less effort in maintaining focus. The researchers also found a strong correspondence between the number of mind-wandering episodes identified by the two methods among participants with meditation experience. This pattern was not observed in participants without meditation experience.
The authors conclude that mindfulness experience appears to be associated with a more stable physiological response when the mind drifts away from its focus and returns to the task. Rather than reacting more strongly when they become aware of a distraction, meditators seem to manage this process in a more regulated and less reactive manner. These findings support the idea that mindfulness practice may contribute to a more flexible relationship with spontaneous thoughts, an aspect that could be relevant for understanding persistent mental patterns associated with anxiety, excessive worry, or rumination.
The study Heart and ocular correlates of self-caught and probe-caught mind wandering during focused mindfulness meditation in meditators and controls, published in the scientific journal Scientific Reports, stems from project 244/22 – Autonomic signatures of mind wandering and its consequences on attention and positive emotions in individuals with different levels of expertise in mindfulness meditation, supported by the Bial Foundation and led by Cristiano Crescentini.
ABSTRACT
Focused meditation involves a dynamic cycle of four mental states: mind-wandering (MW), awareness of distraction (AWARE), shifting attention back (SHIFT), and sustained attentional focus (FOCUS). Meta-awareness of these processes is trained during mindfulness meditation, possibly improving mental health. This study investigated heart rate (HR) and ocular movements during breath-focused meditation in 28 experienced meditators and 28 non-meditating controls. The design integrated two complementary approaches: self-caught (i.e., spontaneously noticing when attention drifts away from the breath) and probe-caught (i.e., interrupting participants to report their attentional state) sampling methods for mind-wandering, alongside mindfulness questionnaires. In the self-caught paradigm, the Group × Phase interaction (p = .017) showed HR increase during FOCUS only in controls. In contrast, meditators’ HR remained stable and showed a negative association with non-judging during AWARE (BF10 = 12.91). Eye movements increased particularly during SHIFT in both groups (p < .001). However, meditators showed lower eye movements in both paradigms (ps ≤ .002). Finally, only meditators showed a significant positive correlation between self-caught and probe-caught episode counts (BF10 = 860.42). These results suggest that mindfulness meditation expertise may be associated with more regulated and less reactive meta-awareness of distraction, with potential implications for maladaptive thought patterns and mental health.